The Full Story

How often do you find yourself seeking feedback that supports your idea while ignoring criticisms? 

Do you find yourself brushing off data and insights that doesn’t align with your vision? 

And are you really listening to your potential customers—or just hearing what you want to hear? 

Could confirmation bias be clouding your judgment, leading you to overlook the flaws in your startup idea?

 

When validating a startup idea, one of the most common traps founders fall into is confirmation bias.

This psychological phenomenon occurs when people seek out or interpret information in a way that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or assumptions while disregarding data that might contradict those beliefs.

 

The Dangers of Confirmation Bias: Real-Life Examples.

Let’s look at a couple of recent examples where confirmation bias affected startup outcomes:

Case 1: The Frank-JP Morgan Scandal.

Charlie Javice, founder of the student financial aid startup Frank, convinced JP Morgan to acquire her company for $175 million. However, it was later revealed that she had allegedly fabricated user data to make the startup seem more successful than it really was. The deception led to lawsuits, reputational damage, and an ongoing high-profile fraud case.

This case is a cautionary tale of how founders, driven by overconfidence and the pressure to secure funding, can manipulate numbers to fit their narrative. It also highlights the risks investors face when they fail to conduct thorough due diligence and instead trust a compelling pitch without validating the underlying data.

Case 2: GloriFi’s Rise and Fall. 

GloriFi, a fintech startup aimed at offering a “conservative alternative” to mainstream banks, launched with significant investor backing and media attention. However, the company quickly collapsed due to operational mismanagement, lack of product-market fit, and financial instability. Despite the enthusiastic vision of its founder and strong investor interest, the startup failed to attract real users who wanted the product.

This case demonstrates how hype and ideological branding alone aren’t enough to sustain a business. Founders and investors were so convinced of their idea’s success that they ignored warning signs about market demand, ultimately leading to GloriFi’s failure.

(a few more real life examples are shared at the end of this article as well)

 

---

What Is Confirmation Bias? 

Confirmation bias is a tendency to:

• Seek out information that supports what you already believe or want to be true, while ignoring or dismissing evidence that contradicts your beliefs.

• Interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting your viewpoint, even when it may not.

• Prioritize positive feedback and focus on only the aspects of your product or idea that are praised, ignoring critical feedback.

 

How Confirmation Bias Affects Your Startup 

For founders, confirmation bias can appear in various ways during the validation process:

• Overvaluing Positive Feedback: When you’re excited about your idea, it’s tempting to focus on the few people who tell you how great your concept is. You may neglect or downplay feedback from others who might highlight potential flaws.

• Ignoring Contradictory Data: If you’re set on the idea that people want a certain product, you might ignore data suggesting there’s low demand or that competitors have already saturated the market. This can lead to wasted time and money developing a product that no one needs or is already available.

• Biased Customer Interviews: You might interview friends, family, or people from your own network, who are more likely to provide positive feedback. But these responses are not necessarily representative of the broader market, and they may reflect a desire to support you rather than objective insights.

 

---

Can you Avoid Confirmation Bias? 

While Confirmation bias cannot completely be avoided, we can be mindful to avoid as much of it as possible. Actively seek out diverse perspectives and challenge your assumptions. 

Here are some strategies to mitigate confirmation bias during your startup validation process:

1. Seek Out Critical Feedback 

While it’s natural to want to hear positive things about your idea, it’s crucial to seek out constructive criticism. Don’t just look for people who will tell you your idea is brilliant—actively engage with those who might question your approach or provide negative feedback.

Example: If your startup aims to create a fitness app, ask users what frustrates them about other fitness apps. If they tell you that they hate clunky interfaces or have difficulty tracking progress, take note. This feedback is invaluable for improving your own app’s user experience.

2. Diversify Your Sources 

Don’t rely on feedback from people who are too similar to you. Seek input from a wide range of people, particularly those who are outside your immediate network. The broader the feedback pool, the less likely you are to filter it through your own biases.

Example: If you’re targeting young professionals, make sure you talk to a variety of people in that demographic, including those with different interests, backgrounds, and tech preferences.

3. Validate with Real Customers 

Rather than relying on assumptions or interviews with friends and colleagues, focus on real customers. This can be done through customer surveys, focus groups, or beta testing. Collect data directly from those who represent your target market—people who will be using your product or service and have no emotional investment in your success.

Example: Instead of relying solely on family members to evaluate your new mobile app, conduct user testing with potential customers. This will give you honest, actionable insights about usability, features, and what needs improvement.

4. Ask the Right Questions 

When conducting interviews or surveys, avoid leading questions that encourage a specific answer. Ask open-ended, neutral questions that give respondents the freedom to express their true opinions. This ensures you’re getting more than just positive feedback.

Example: Instead of asking, “Would you love a faster way to order food online?” ask, “What challenges do you face when ordering food online?” This opens the door to more honest and helpful feedback.

5. Use A/B Testing 

If you’re unsure about certain aspects of your product or service (like pricing, design, or features), use A/B testing to see how different variations perform. This lets data, rather than assumptions, guide your decisions.

Example: A subscription-based business might test two different pricing structures (e.g., monthly vs. yearly subscriptions) to see which one generates more sign-ups, helping to confirm which pricing strategy appeals most to users.

---

Summary

• Confirmation Bias is a psychological phenomenon where founders prioritize information that supports their existing beliefs while ignoring contradicting data, leading to poor startup validation decisions.
  

• The Risks: Relying on confirmation bias can cause startups to:

  • Overvalue positive feedback and neglect constructive criticism.

  • Ignore contradictory data that could indicate market saturation or product flaws.

  • Conduct biased customer interviews, distorting real customer insights.
    

• Recent Examples:

  • Frank-JP Morgan Scandal: Founder’s manipulation of user data led to fraud charges, highlighting the dangers of overconfidence and unchecked assumptions.

  • GloriFi’s Fall: Ideological passion and media hype led to poor market fit and failure, illustrating how hype can cloud judgment.
    

• Mitigating Confirmation Bias:

  • Seek Critical Feedback: Challenge your assumptions and actively seek constructive criticism.

  • Diversify Your Feedback Pool: Gather insights from a wide range of perspectives, beyond your immediate network.

  • Validate with Real Customers: Focus on gathering data from actual users, not just friends and family.

  • Ask the Right Questions: Use open-ended, neutral questions to avoid leading responses.

• Use A/B Testing: Let data guide decisions by testing different product variations.
  

---

Conclusion

Confirmation bias is the silent killer in the startup world. It’s easy to fall into the trap of assuming your idea is perfect and only seeking feedback that supports your views. 

The successful startups are those that challenge their assumptions, seek diverse perspectives, and make data-driven decisions based on feedback from real customers.

---

6. A few more examples.

Forward’s Failed Healthcare Innovation

Forward, a healthcare startup founded by former Google and Uber executives, sought to revolutionize primary care with AI-driven “CarePods.” Despite raising over $650 million, the venture faced technical failures and low user adoption, leading to the abrupt closure of all locations in November 2024.

The Failure of Google Glass

When Google Glass first launched, many in the tech industry hailed it as a revolutionary product. However, Google’s team became so focused on the technology’s potential that they ignored key customer concerns, such as privacy and discomfort. Instead of listening to the critiques about its practicality, Google only sought validation from its own networks and tech enthusiasts. The result? A product that was ahead of its time and ultimately failed to capture mainstream consumer interest.

The Success of Airbnb 

In contrast, Airbnb founders took a proactive approach to avoid confirmation bias. They validated their idea by testing it with real customers in their own homes, gathering feedback on pricing, user experience, and the idea of renting out private spaces. This initial validation experiment led them to refine the model and ultimately launch a successful global business.

A bit more about the Frank-JP Morgan Scandal

This case is fascinating because it’s not just about confirmation bias—it’s about outright deception fuelled by overconfidence. Charlie Javice allegedly fabricated user data to make her startup seem more successful than it was, leading JP Morgan to acquire Frank for $175 million. The aftermath of fraud accusations, lawsuits, and a high-profile trial makes this a gripping cautionary tale. It highlights how some founders can be so committed to their vision (or personal gain) that they ignore reality—even when the negative stakes are massive.

➡ Why it stands out:

• Involves a high-profile acquisition and legal consequences.

• Shows how the pressure to secure funding/acquisition can lead to unethical decisions.

• Offers a stark warning about the risks of overhyping startup metrics.

 

GloriFi’s Rise and Fall

GloriFi’s failure is another standout because it highlights how a startup can implode despite major investor backing and media buzz. The fintech startup aimed to create a “conservative alternative” to mainstream banks but collapsed within months due to operational mismanagement and an overestimation of demand. The founder’s vision resonated with investors, but they failed to validate whether customers actually wanted the product.

➡ Why it stands out:

• Shows how ideological branding alone isn’t enough to sustain a business.

• Highlights the dangers of launching too quickly without product-market fit.

• Demonstrates how hype and investor enthusiasm can mask fundamental flaws.

 

---

Missed the last articles?  https://cxosweden.com/posts-grid/